NC’s first-in-the-nation medical debt forgiveness program — inspired in part by our Debt Jubilee Project – is now being shared with other states that could follow suit. The NC Department of Health and Human Services has created a website with a template that other states can borrow.
Under the plan, hospitals would forgive more than a decade of existing medical debt for eligible residents and work to prevent the accumulation of new debt going forward. Past medical debt that exceeds 5% of a person’s annual income will be relieved. In exchange, hospitals receive higher levels of Medicaid reimbursement under the federal Healthcare Access and Stabilization Program (HASP). Participating hospitals are required to curb aggressive debt collection practices for low-income patients, such as debt sales, excessive interest rates and home foreclosures. Hospitals are required to meet and report on these and other milestones, as well as publicly post debt relief policies.
Several other states has encouraged hospitals to work with Undue Medical Debt, usually using state funds (as Pensylvania did) to purchase the debts at a steep discount through the charity. However, NC’s plan of leveraging HASP funds was a new concept, and proveds the “carrot” to entice hospital systems to sign on.
Over the last three years, Trinity Moravian Church’s Debt Jubilee Project has worked with Undue Medical Debt to purchase and forgive over $18 million in medical debts owed by our neighbors in central NC. Our campaign went viral and has inspired many similar campaigns all over the country. Most recently, the Debt Jubilee Project helped inspire Governor Cooper and state officials with the DHHS in Raleigh to put together a “first-in-the-nation” program that made it feasible for hospitals forgive past-due medical debts across the board for poorer patients.
But that’s only hospital debt! There are many other kinds of medical debt – physician practices, rehab, tests, etc. We have identified $2 million in qualifying past-due medical debts in central NC that is available on the open market for purchase.
We want to raise $15,000 between December 1st and January 15th to purchase this debt – and abolish it! YOU CAN HELP! Just make your donation here in any amount, and help one of your neighbors find peace of mind and liberty from harassing debt collectors. Probably the amount we raise will go further than the $2 million we have targeted, so any overflow will be used to alleviate debts state-wide.
All donations are fully tax deductible as allowed by law.
We intend to purchase all the medical debt available in these counties:
Alleghany County, North Carolina Cabarrus County, North Carolina Davidson County, North Carolina Davie County, North Carolina Forsyth County, North Carolina Guilford County, North Carolina Montgomery County, North Carolina Randolph County, North Carolina Stanly County, North Carolina Stokes County, North Carolina Surry County, North Carolina Wilkes County, North Carolina
Any overflow will be used to pay medical debts in other counties in NC.
While hot-button health care issues such as abortion and the Affordable Care Act roil the presidential race, Democrats and Republicans in statehouses around the country have been quietly working together to tackle the nation’s medical debt crisis.
New laws to curb aggressive hospital billing, to expand charity care for lower-income patients, and to rein in debt collectors have been enacted in more than 20 states since 2021.
Democrats championed most measures. But the legislative efforts often passed with Republican support. In a few states, GOP lawmakers led the push to expand patient protections.
“Regardless of their party, regardless of their background … any significant medical procedure can place people into bankruptcy,” Florida House Speaker Paul Renner, a conservative Republican, said in an interview. “This is a real issue.”
Renner, who has shepherded controversial measures to curb abortion rights and expand the death penalty in Florida, this year also led an effort to limit when hospitals could send patients to collections. It garnered unanimous support in the Florida Legislature.
Bipartisan measures in other states have gone further, barring unpaid medical bills from consumer credit reports and restricting medical providers from placing liens on patients’ homes.
About 100 million people in the U.S. are burdened by some form of health care debt, forcing millions to drain savings, take out second mortgages, or cut back on food and other essentials, KFF Health News has found. A quarter of those with debt owed more than $5,000 in 2022.
“Republicans in the legislature seem more open to protecting people from medical debt than from other kinds of debt,” said Marceline White, executive director of Economic Action Maryland, which helped lead efforts in that state to stop medical providers from garnishing the wages of low-income patients. That bill drew unanimous support from Democrats and Republicans
“There seems to be broad agreement that you shouldn’t lose your home or your life savings because you got ill,” White said. “That’s just a basic level of fairness.”
Medical debt remains a more polarizing issue in Washington, where the Biden administration has pushed several efforts to tackle the issue, including a proposed rule by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, or CFPB, to bar all medical debt from consumer credit reports.
Vice President Kamala Harris, who is spearheading the administration’s medical debt campaign, has touted the work on the presidential campaign trail while calling for new efforts to retire health care debt for millions of Americans.
Former President Donald Trump doesn’t typically talk about medical debt while stumping. But congressional Republicans have blasted the CFPB proposal, which House Financial Services Committee Chairman Patrick McHenry (R-N.C.) called “regulatory overreach.”
Nevertheless, pollster Michael Perry, who has surveyed Americans extensively about health care, said that conservative voters typically wary of government seem to view medical debt through another lens. “I think they feel it’s so stacked against them that they, as patients, don’t really have a voice,” he said. “The partisan divides we normally see just aren’t there.”
When Arizona consumer advocates put a measure on the ballot in 2022 to cap interest rates on medical debt, 72% of voters backed the initiative.
Similarly, nationwide polls have found more than 80% of Republicans and Democrats back limits on medical debt collections and stronger requirements that hospitals provide financial aid to patients.
Perry surfaced something else that may be driving bipartisan interest in medical debt: growing mistrust as health systems get bigger and act more like major corporations. “Hospitals aren’t what they used to be,” he said. “That is making it clear that profit and greed are driving lots of the decision-making.”
Not every state effort to address medical debt has garnered broad bipartisan support.
When Colorado last year became the first state to bar medical debt from residents’ credit reports, just one Republican lawmaker backed the measure. A Minnesota bill that did the same thing this year passed without a single GOP vote.
But elsewhere, similarly tough measures have sailed through.
A 2024 Illinois bill to bar credit reporting for medical debt passed unanimously in the state Senate and cleared the House of Representatives 109-2. In Rhode Island, not a single GOP lawmaker opposed a credit reporting ban.
And when the California Legislature took up a 2021 bill to require hospitals in the state to provide more financial assistance to patients, it passed 72-0 in the state Assembly and 39-0 in the Senate.
Even some conservative states, such as Oklahoma, have taken steps, albeit more modest. A new law there bars medical providers from pursuing patients for debts if the provider has not publicly posted its prices. The measure, signed by the state’s Republican governor, passed unanimously.
New Mexico state Sen. Steve Neville, a Republican who backed legislation to restrict aggressive collections against low-income patients in that state, said he was simply being pragmatic.
“There was not much advantage to spending a lot of time trying to do collections on indigent patients,” Neville said. “If they don’t have the money, they don’t have the money.” Three of 12 GOP senators supported the measure.
North Carolina state Treasurer Dale Folwell, a Republican who as a state legislator spearheaded a 2012 effort to ban same-sex marriage, said all elected officials, no matter their party, should care about what medical debt is doing to patients.
“It doesn’t matter if, as a conservative, I’m saying these things, or if Bernie Sanders is saying these things,” Folwell said, referencing Vermont’s liberal U.S. senator. “At the end of the day, it should be all our jobs to advocate for the invisible.”
KFF Health News is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues and is one of the core operating programs at KFF—an independent source of health policy research, polling, and journalism. Learn more about KFF.
Republished with permission from KFF Health News.
Subscribe to KFF Health News’ free Morning Briefing.
RALEIGH, N.C. (AP) — North Carolina state government is seeking to rid potentially billions in medical debt from low- and middle-income residents by offering a financial carrot for hospitals to take unpaid bills off the books and to implement policies supporting future patients.
Democratic Gov. Roy Cooper and his health chief unveiled a plan that they want federal Medicaid regulators to approve soon, It would allow roughly 100 hospitals that recently began receiving enhanced federal Medicaid reimbursement funds to get even more money.
(Raleigh, N.C.) – North Carolina State Treasurer Dale R. Folwell, CPA, released a report that shows extreme variations in hospital prices, huge price markups from Medicare rates, and widespread failures in price transparency.
The report’s findings raise troubling questions about health care access and affordability, and North Carolina’s justice system. The report found massive disparities among hospital prices, and failures in price transparency that have crippled patients’ ability to protect their financial health. This is especially troubling given an earlier report found that North Carolina hospital systems sued 7,517 patients over medical debt, using the court system to charge interest on medical debt judgments and to place liens on family homes. When patients tried to fight back, they argued that they could not even tell whether they had been charged a fair price.
(Raleigh, N.C.) — State Treasurer Dale R. Folwell, CPA, and the State Health Plan released a new report today showing that the majority of North Carolina hospitals did not lose money on Medicare — they profited. The report found huge disparities between the Medicare losses claimed by hospital executives and the numbers that hospitals reported to the federal government. This raises serious concerns over hospitals’ commitment to their patients and their charitable mission, and the steep costs passed on to the nearly 740,000 members of the State Health Plan.
Hospital executives have justified their tax exemptions and their crushing price inflation by claiming to lose billions of dollars on Medicare patients. North Carolina hospital lobbyists claimed they lost $3.1 billion on Medicare in 2020 — the same year hospitals actually reaped a total of $87 million in Medicare profits. The questionable loss claim was 3,670% larger than hospitals’ self-reported Medicare profits.
“The hospital cartel is overcharging you because they can, not because they need to,” said Treasurer Folwell. “Hospital executives can’t keep hiding behind Medicare. They tried to claim huge losses to justify financially kneecapping their patients. But now we know that the majority of hospitals are actually profiting off Medicare.”
(Raleigh, N.C.) — An analysis released by Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health and the North Carolina State Health Plan revealed that the majority of North Carolina nonprofit hospitals are not fully honoring their charitable mission. Although nonprofit hospitals reap lucrative tax breaks in exchange for serving the poor, their charity care spending varies wildly and with little accountability. Researchers from Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health found troubling disparities in North Carolina hospitals’ charity care spending.
Fewer than 25 hospitals exceeded the value of their tax exemption with the amount of their charity care spending in North Carolina. Our analysis suggests that North Carolina’s largest nonprofit hospital systems reaped tax breaks worth more than an estimated $1.8 billion in 2019-2020. Across the majority of these systems, charity care spending did not exceed 60% of the value of their tax breaks. On average, North Carolina hospitals were far more profitable than the national average. But one in five families in North Carolina has medical debt in collections.
“Charity care is the heart of what it means to be a nonprofit hospital,” NC State Treasurer Dale Folwell said. “Our hospital systems justify overcharging state employees and taxpayers by pointing to their charity care costs. But now we know that is not fully accurate. They are profiting on the backs of sick patients.”
